Skip to Content
Law Office of Daniel Horowitz Law Office of Daniel Horowitz
Call Us Today! 925-291-5388
Top

What is a Public Forum?

Daniel Horowitz Logo
|

Public Forums vs. Nonpublic Forums: Understanding First Amendment Rights on Government Property

The First Amendment's protection of free speech varies depending on the type of government property involved. Understanding the distinction between public forums and nonpublic forums is crucial.

Types of Forums and First Amendment Protections:

  • Traditional Public Forums:
    • Definition: These are places historically open for public expression, such as streets, parks, and sidewalks.
    • Protection: Highest level of First Amendment protection.
    • Restrictions:
      • Content-based restrictions face strict scrutiny.
      • Viewpoint discrimination is prohibited.
      • Reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions are allowed.
    • Example: Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, 585 U.S. 1 (2018), Sanctity of Human Life Network v. California Highway Patrol, 105 Cal.App.4th 858 (2003).
  • Designated Public Forums:
    • Definition: Government properties intentionally opened for public expression, though not traditionally public forums.
    • Protection: Same strict scrutiny as traditional public forums.
    • Example: Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. Summum, 555 U.S. 460 (2009).
  • Nonpublic Forums:
    • Definition: Government properties not traditionally or intentionally opened for public communication.
    • Protection: Lower level of First Amendment protection.
    • Restrictions:
      • Restrictions must be reasonable.
      • Restrictions cannot be based on viewpoint discrimination.
    • Example: Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, 585 U.S. 1 (2018), Arkansas Educ. Television Com'n v. Forbes, 523 U.S. 666 (1998).

Key Principles and Case Law:

  • Government Intent and Property Nature: The government's intent and the property's characteristics determine the forum type.
    • Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., 473 U.S. 788 (1985).
    • U.S. v. Kokinda, 497 U.S. 720 (1990).
  • Limited Public Forums: Some areas, like library outdoor areas, may be limited public forums, allowing reasonable restrictions.
    • Prigmore v. City of Redding, 211 Cal.App.4th 1322 (2012).
  • Viewpoint Neutrality: Even in nonpublic forums, restrictions must be viewpoint-neutral.
    • International Society for Krishna Consciousness of California, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, 48 Cal.4th 446 (2010).

In Simple Terms:

Imagine different places where you can express yourself. A traditional public forum is like a town square, always open for speech. A designated public forum is like a school auditorium, opened for specific events. A nonpublic forum is like a government office, where speech can be restricted. The level of protection you have depends on the type of place.