Skip to Content
Law Office of Daniel Horowitz Law Office of Daniel Horowitz
Call Us Today! 925-291-5388
Top

What is Symbolic Speech?

Daniel Horowitz Logo
|

Symbolic Speech: When Can the Federal Government Regulate?

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects freedom of speech, and this protection extends beyond just spoken or written words. Symbolic speech, or expressive conduct, involves using actions and symbols to convey a message.

What is Symbolic Speech?

  • Definition: Nonverbal communication that expresses an idea or opinion.
  • Examples: Wearing armbands, burning flags, staging sit-ins, displaying signs, or even engaging in performance art can all be forms of symbolic speech.
  • First Amendment Protection: The First Amendment safeguards symbolic speech if it is intended to convey a specific message, and that message is likely to be understood by those who witness it.
    • Civil Rights Department v. Cathy's Creations, Inc., --- Cal.Rptr.3d ---- (2025)

When Can the Government Regulate Symbolic Speech?

While symbolic speech is protected, it's not absolute. The government can regulate it under certain circumstances, often using a test established in United States v. O'Brien:

  • The O'Brien Test: A government regulation of symbolic speech is permissible if it:
    1. Is within the government's constitutional power.
    2. Furthers an important or substantial government interest.
    3. Is unrelated to the suppression of free expression.
    4. Is no greater than essential to further that interest.
    • City of Erie v. Pap's A.M., 529 U.S. 277 (2000), Crownover v. Musick, 9 Cal.3d 405 (1973)

Content-Based vs. Content-Neutral Restrictions:

  • Content-Neutral: If a regulation doesn't target the message of the symbolic speech but rather the time, place, or manner of its expression, it's subject to less stringent scrutiny. It must be narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest and leave open alternative channels for communication.
    • Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703 (2000)
  • Content-Based: If a regulation specifically targets the message of the symbolic speech, it faces strict scrutiny. The government must prove it's necessary to serve a compelling state interest and is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.
    • City of Erie v. Pap's A.M., 529 U.S. 277 (2000)

Landmark Cases:

  • Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989): The Supreme Court held that burning the American flag as a form of protest is protected symbolic speech.
  • Spence v. State of Wash., 418 U.S. 405 (1974): The Court protected the display of an altered U.S. flag as symbolic speech, emphasizing the importance of context and intent.

Key Takeaway:

Symbolic speech is a powerful form of expression. While the First Amendment provides significant protection, the government can regulate it under specific conditions to balance free speech with other important interests.