Skip to Content
Law Office of Daniel Horowitz Law Office of Daniel Horowitz
Call Us Today! 925-291-5388
Top

What is "Mens Rea" or the Guilty Mind in Criminal Law?

Daniel Horowitz Logo
|

Mens Rea: The "Guilty Mind" in Criminal Law

"Mens rea," a Latin term meaning "guilty mind," is a fundamental principle in criminal law that distinguishes between accidental actions and intentional crimes. In essence, it's the mental state or intent a person must have to be found guilty of a crime.

Understanding Mens Rea:

  • Definition: Mens rea refers to the "state of mind or inattention that, together with its accompanying conduct, the criminal law defines as an offense." (Kahler v. Kansas, 589 U.S. 271 (2020))
  • Core Concept: It involves a guilty mind concerning an element of a crime.
  • Varying Degrees: Mens rea isn't a one-size-fits-all concept. It can vary in degree, including:
    • Actual knowledge
    • Recklessness
    • Negligence
    • Different elements of a single crime can require different mental states. (Rehaif v. United States, 588 U.S. 225 (2019))

The Importance of Mens Rea:

  • Presumption of Mens Rea: In Anglo-American criminal law, mens rea is the rule, not the exception. Even if a law doesn't explicitly state it, courts often assume a mens rea element exists. (People v. Simon, 9 Cal.4th 493 (1995)), (People v. Hawkins, 98 Cal.App.4th 1428 (2002))
  • Knowingly Acting: A person acts "knowingly" when they are aware that a result is practically certain to follow from their conduct. (Counterman v. Colorado, 600 U.S. 66 (2023))
  • Legislative Intent: The presumption of mens rea applies unless there's a clear indication that the legislature intended to eliminate it. (People v. Taylor, 93 Cal.App.4th 933 (2001))

Exceptions: Strict Liability Offenses:

  • Strict Liability: In some cases, like certain public welfare offenses, strict liability may be imposed. This means mens rea isn't required. (Stark v. Superior Court, 52 Cal.4th 368 (2011))
  • Limited Application: Strict liability offenses are generally disfavored and limited to situations where:
    • The conduct poses a threat to public health or safety.
    • The penalties are relatively light. (In re Jorge M., 23 Cal.4th 866 (2000))

Key Takeaway:

Mens rea is a crucial component of criminal liability, requiring proof of a defendant's mental state in relation to the elements of the offense. This principle is deeply embedded in criminal law and is generally presumed to be required unless explicitly stated otherwise by the legislature.